Agreement on 16 December 2010 on the status, the tasks, management and implementation of the U.S. military training mission, known as the U.S. Military Assistance Advisory Group in Saudi Arabia, the Obama administration said in its annual Afghanistan-Pakistan review that it remains committed to a long-term partnership with Afghanistan as a member of the NATO coalition.62 , the government stated that U.S. forces would begin transferring responsibility for security to the Afghan government in 2011 and conclude the transfer in 2014.63 It is not clear whether the United States intends to conclude strategic and security agreements, such as those deployed in Iraq, during the announced transition period. CANPAÉs are often included with other types of military agreements as part of a comprehensive security agreement with a given country. A CANAPÉ itself is not a safety device; On the contrary, the rights and privileges of U.S. personnel in a country in support of the broader security agreement are defined. SOFA may be registered on the basis of powers contained in previous treaties and measures of Congress or as exclusive executive agreements. The United States currently participates in more than 100 agreements that can be considered SOFA.
A list of the current agreements at the end of this report is categorized into the tables based on the source of underlying authority, if any, for each CANAPÉ. The diagrams below contain a list of current agreements based on the underlying source of authority, if any, for each OF the CANAPES. In each category, agreements are categorized by partner country in alphabetical order. The categories are defined as: An Agreement on the Status of the Armed Forces (SOFA) is an agreement between a host country and a foreign nation that deploys military forces in that country. CANPAÉs are often included with other types of military agreements as part of a comprehensive security agreement. A CANAPÉ is not a safety device; it establishes the rights and privileges of foreign staff in a host country in order to support the greater security regime.  Under international law, a force status agreement differs from military occupation. The agreements reached cover several issues and should have a different legal scope on the part of the parties.